Weißenfels oor Nederlands
Weißenfels
en
Weißenfels (district)
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Nederlands
Weißenfels
en
Weißenfels (district)
nl
Weißenfels (district)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Weißenfels v Parliament
Arrest van het Gerecht van eerste aanleg van 25 januari 2006 — Weißenfels tegen Parlement
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
Annul the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 January 2006 in Case T-33/04 (Weißenfels v European Parliament) (1), notified on 31 January 2006;
Ik hou van waar ze voor staan, " geen zorgen het is bijna lente. "EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 25 January 2006 in Case T-33/04 Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament.
Charlie, ik denk dat ze willen dat je enkele opmerkingen maaktEurLex-2 EurLex-2
85 The general scheme and purpose of the case-law concerning purely confirmatory measures seek to ensure compliance with the time limits allowed for legal remedies and observance of res judicata (see, to that effect, judgments of 18 December 2007, Weißenfels v Parliament, C‐135/06 P, EU:C:2007:812, paragraph 54 and the case-law cited, and of 19 February 2009, Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso v Parliament, C‐308/07 P, EU:C:2009:103, paragraph 58 and the case-law cited) and, accordingly, to protect the principle of legal certainty (see, to that effect, judgments of 18 January 2007, PKK and KNK v Council, C‐229/05 P, EU:C:2007:32, paragraph 101; of 18 October 2007, Commission v Parliament and Council, C‐299/05, EU:C:2007:608, paragraph 29, and order of 29 June 2009, Cofra v Commission, C‐295/08 P, not published, EU:C:2009:407, paragraphs 53 and 54).
Om de teamgeest te bevordereneurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
Otherwise, the person concerned is entitled to challenge either the confirmed decision, or the confirmatory decision, or both (judgment of 18 December 2007, Weißenfels v Parliament, C‐135/06 P, EU:C:2007:812, paragraph 54).
Machines die bestemd zijn voor het heffen van personen of personen en goederen moeten voorzien zijn van een ophangings- of ondersteuningsinrichting voor de drager die zodanig is ontworpen en gebouwd dat een aanvaardbaar algemeen veiligheidsniveau wordt gegarandeerd en dat wordt voorkomen dat de drager valteurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
Annul the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of # January # in Case T-#/# (Weißenfels v European Parliament), notified on # January
Heb je deze niet nodig?- Dat was maar voor de showoj4 oj4
Appeal: against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 in Case T-33/04 Weißenfels v Parliament (not published in the ECR), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Ik kan niet zwemmen!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Weißenfels before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and the Court of Justice of the European Communties.
Dit was jouw keuze, AeonEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 26 October 1993. - Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament. - Officials - Admissibility - Annulment of two decisions on promotion - Consideration of comparative merits - Verbal assurances of promotion. - Case T-22/92.
het type glijpadreferentie en baangeleiding, zoals visuele hulpmiddelen, MLS, #D–NAV, ILS, LLZ, VOR, NDBEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Under Article 91(1) of the Staff Regulations, the Tribunal has, in such disputes, unlimited jurisdiction which entrusts it with the task of providing a complete solution to those disputes and thus of ruling on all the rights and obligations of the staff member, save for leaving to the institution in question, under the control of the Tribunal, the implementation of such part of the judgment and under such precise conditions as the Tribunal shall determine (see, to that effect, judgment of 18 December 2007 in Case C-135/06 P Weißenfels v Parliament, paragraphs 65, 67 and 68; judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 2 July 2009 in Case F-49/08 Giannini v Commission, paragraphs 39 to 42).
De bedrijfsleider verbindt zich er toe zijn volle medewerking te verlenen aan de erkende bedrijfsleidingsdienst en daartoe op een eerlijk, nauwkeurige en volledige wijze al de nodige gegevens te bezorgen die nuttig zijn voor de uitoefening van zijn opdrachtEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The proceedings relate to a dispute in a staff case between a Community official, Mr Roderich Weißenfels (‘the appellant’), and the European Parliament.
Hij zal op de weg wel op ons wachtenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
49 The unlimited jurisdiction conferred on the Courts of the European Union by Article 91(1) of the Staff Regulations entrusts the Courts of the Union with the task of providing a complete solution to the disputes brought before it (Weißenfels v Parliament, paragraph 67, and Case C‐197/09 RX‐II M v EMEA [2009] ECR I‐0000, paragraph 56).
Denk je dat de demon de moeder doodde?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Appellant: Roderich Weißenfels (represented by: G.
Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaatEurLex-2 EurLex-2
45 ‘Disputes of a financial character’ within the meaning of that provision include not only actions brought by staff members seeking to have an institution held liable, but also all those seeking payment by an institution to a staff member of a sum which he considers to be due to him under the Staff Regulations or other measure governing their working relations (see, to that effect, Case C‐135/06 P Weißenfels v Parliament [2007] ECR I‐12041, paragraph 65).
De basis voor het overleg werd gevormd door vrijwillige afspraken, de in 2003 in Madrid overeengekomen richtlijnen voor goede praktijken.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 January 2006 in Case T-33/04 Roderich Weißenfels v Parliament, whereby the Court of First Instance dismissed the appellant's application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 26 June 2003 deducting from the sum of the double dependent child allowance, granted to the appellant under Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, the amount of an allowance of like nature received from another source — Conditions for the application of the rule against overlapping referred to in Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations — meaning of ‘allowances of like nature’
HuurappartementenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2006 — Weißenfels v Parliament
Je zou me naar de Wetenschapsbeurs moeten brengenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
40 The Court concluded that it is for the Courts of the European Union, in an appropriate case, to order an institution to pay a sum to which the applicant is entitled under the Staff Regulations or another legal measure (judgment in Weißenfels v Parliament, C‐135/06 P, EU:C:2007:812, paragraph 68).
Je trok een gezichtEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Case T-#/#: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of # January #- Weißenfels v Parliament (Officials- Remuneration- Dependent child allowance- Double allowance for a handicapped child- Article # of the Staff Regulations- Deduction of an allowance of like nature
Het spijt me, maar hoorde je hem?oj4 oj4
Case C-#/# P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of # December #- Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament (Appeal- Remuneration- Dependent child allowance- Deduction of the amount of an allowance of like nature paid from other sources- Unlimited jurisdiction- Disputes of a financial character
Je probeerde cross referencing de lodge nameor naam van de straatoj4 oj4
Orders the European Parliament to pay to Mr Weißenfels the arrears of dependent child allowances which he should have received as from 1 July 2003, together with interest at the statutory rate.
lk ga water halen- Haal water en maak ' t nog erger of- azijn om ' t te neutraliseren- Laat me alsjeblieft losEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Elector Augustus gave her the Poor Clares monastery at Weißenfels with all income and interest.
Bijgevolg wordt volgens de Commissie nietvoldaan aan de voorwaarden voor de toepassing van artikel #, lid #, onder d), van het EG-VerdragWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Appellant: Roderich Weißenfels (represented by: G.
Laat hem binnen, de grote boze wolfEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2007 — Roderich Weißenfels v European Parliament
De Commissie wordt gemachtigd namens de Gemeenschap de vereiste wijzigingen van de bijlagen bij de overeenkomst goed te keuren, teneinde overeenstemming te garanderen met de krachtens artikel #, onder a), van Richtlijn #/#/EG bedoelde ter kennis gebrachte gegevens betreffende de bevoegde autoriteiten en de gegevens in de bijlage daarbijEurLex-2 EurLex-2
An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on # February # by Roderich Weißenfels, residing in Bereldingen (Luxembourg), represented by H. Arend, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg
Tenslotte wil ik een lijst oplezen van lidstaten die de conventie inzake de bescherming van de financiële belangen van de EU nog niet hebben geratificeerd: België, Luxemburg, Nederland, Italië, Spanje, Portugal, Griekenland, Ierland en Frankrijk.oj4 oj4
An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 February 2004 by Roderich Weißenfels, residing in Bereldingen (Luxembourg), represented by H.
Meerdere sleutels aan een ringEurLex-2 EurLex-2
This Statement of Privacy applies to the Stadtbibliothek Weißenfels Web site and governs data collection and usage.
Dit kan een symptoom zijn van een ernstige darmontsteking (genaamd 'pseudomembraneuze colitis ').Dit kan gebeuren na het gebruiken van antibioticaParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
45 sinne gevind in 9 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.