25 The Court has already held that it could not, in the context of an action against a decision of the Board of Appeal relating to opposition proceedings, take account of a later revocation decision concerning the mark on which the opposition was based, since the revocation decision could not have had an effect for the earlier period (judgment of 4 November 2008 in Group Lottuss v OHIM — Ugly (COYOTE UGLY), T‐161/07, ECR, EU:T:2008:473, paragraphs 47 to 50).
Toksilisuse uuringutes loomadega (rott, ahv, hiir) ei ole ilmnenud järjekindlat toksilisuse mudelit, välja arvatud hepatotsellulaarse hüpertroofiaga seostatav maksa suurenemine, mis tekkis suurte stiripentooli annuste manustamisel närilistele ja mittenärilisteleEurLex-2 EurLex-2