MasterCard Lola
MasterCard Lola
MasterCard oor Fins
MasterCard
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
MasterCard
However, that decision - the MasterCard decision - was based solely on the specific facts of that case.
MasterCardia koskeva päätös perustui kuitenkin ainoastaan tämän nimenomaisen tapauksen erityisiin näkökohtiin.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
mastercard
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
mastercard
However, that decision - the MasterCard decision - was based solely on the specific facts of that case.
MasterCardia koskeva päätös perustui kuitenkin ainoastaan tämän nimenomaisen tapauksen erityisiin näkökohtiin.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Soortgelyke frases
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
order EUIPO and MasterCard International Incorporated to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred in the proceedings before the EUIPO.
Kuulkaa, siltä varalta ettei Eversti saa häntä ylipuhuttua.Haluaisin puhua Teal' cin kanssaEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
61 As to the remainder, in so far as the arguments set out in paragraphs 50 to 52 of the present judgment allege an error of law with regard to the assessment of the question whether MasterCard is an association of undertakings, it should be noted that, contrary to the Commission’s contention, the appellants are not, in essence, merely challenging the assessment of the facts made at first instance, but are relying, for the main part, on questions of law which are admissible at the appeal stage.
– Se on vain vähän stressiä. – Vai stressiä!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
66 That interpretation is not called into question by the argument put forward by MasterCard Europe that the situations in which a three party payment card scheme is subject to the access obligation should be the same as those in which such a system is subject to the obligations relating to interchange fees pursuant to Article 1(5) and Article 2(18) of Regulation 2015/751, the scope and validity of which are the subject matter of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling in the case that gave rise to the judgment of today’s date, American Express (C‐304/16).
g/# ml # g/# ml # g/# ml Sijoitetaan rasian etusivun oikeaan yläkulmaan ilmoittaen säiliön kokonaissisällön ja tilavuudeneurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
On 22 April 2016, DG Competition provided MasterCard with the last instalment of other passages of the data room report whose confidential nature MasterCard had not referred to me for independent review and which DG Competition had undertaken to release if relevant third parties consented.
tietyistä kolmansista maista peräisin olevien vähintään # ja enintään # kilogramman painoisten elävien nautaeläinten tariffikiintiön soveltamista koskevista yksityiskohtaisista säännöistä# päivänä kesäkuuta # annettu komission asetus (EY) N:oEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
16 On 19 December 2007, the Commission adopted Decision C(2007) 6474 final relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/34.579 — MasterCard, COMP/36.518 — EuroCommerce, COMP 38.580 — Commercial Cards) (‘the contested decision’), the main elements of which are reproduced below.
Euroopan yhteisö laatii luettelon sovellettavista vähimmäisvaatimuksista, jotta voidaan varmistaa, että moldovalaiset hakijat saavat johdonmukaiset ja yhtenevät perustiedot ja että heiltä vaaditaan periaatteessa samat liiteasiakirjatEurLex-2 EurLex-2
61 – The sentence reads as follows: ‘Since it is acknowledged that the MIF sets a floor for the MSC and in so far as the Commission was legitimately entitled to find that a MasterCard system operating without a MIF would remain economically viable, it necessarily follows that the MIF has effects restrictive of competition’.
Taustan väritys on tarkka ja hyvin sekoitettuEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Can't exactly put it on a MasterCard.
Helvetti soikoon!OpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
The Commission also based its analysis on the fact that MasterCard cards generated revenues or financial benefits other than just the MIF for the banks in connection with their issuing business.
Haudataan seEurLex-2 EurLex-2
75 The applicants’ reference to the alleged objective necessity of the MIF must be understood to mean that the Commission ought to have concluded that the MIF was an ancillary restriction in relation to the MasterCard system and that, therefore, the Commission was not entitled to consider its effects on competition independently, but should have examined it in conjunction with the effects of the MasterCard system to which it related.
Meillä on tietysti vielä aikaa käydä todellista keskustelua Euroopan tulevaisuudesta.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
On that date, MasterCard was the subject of an initial public offering (‘IPO’) on the New York Stock Exchange (United States), which modified its structure and governance.
korostaa, että sekä kansallisten viranomaisten keskenään että kansallisten ja EU:n viranomaisten on toimittava tiiviissä yhteistyössä kansanterveyttä koskevia tietoja vaihtaessaan, jotta voidaan huolehtia säännöstön mahdollisimman hyvästä täytäntöönpanosta ja suojella paremmin EU:n kansalaisia kansainvälisiltä kansanterveydellisiltä hätätilanteiltaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The second plea in the main appeal, alleging an error of law and/or inadequate reasoning with regard to the assessment of the question whether MasterCard is an association of undertakings
Jokainen ansaitsee tämänEurLex-2 EurLex-2
For example, in relation to non-confidential versions of documents regarding a data collection process that was prepared specifically for access to the file purposes, see Commission Opinion of 29 October 2015, in application of Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Mastercard Incorporated and Others, (C(2015) 7682 final), paragraph 23, where the Commission stated that, for the purposes of the Commission’s investigation, it had been unnecessary to take a position as to whether the information was confidential vis-à-vis other parties, but that third parties who provided the information might object to sharing the information with the claimant.
Onko sormissasi tuntoa?EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
When is the Commission going to propose legislation designed to create a single market in this field, thereby enabling businesses which establish contracts with credit card issuers (VISA, Mastercard, etc.) to do so where it is most advantageous for them and not compulsorily in their own country, as is currently the case?
Hankintayksiköt voivat seuraavissa tapauksissa käyttää menettelyä ilman edeltävää tarjouskilpailuanot-set not-set
According to MasterCard, this late dispatch prevented the Member State representatives from being able fully to understand MasterCard’s arguments in advance of the hearing, alleging a breach of MasterCard’s legitimate expectations and right to be heard.
Voin vain todeta, että tästä asiasta käydään kiivasta keskustelua komitean ulkopuolella, mutta ei komiteassa.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The General Court therefore concluded, in the light of the same elements of continuity on which the Commission had relied, that the Commission had been entitled to characterise MasterCard as an association of undertakings and the decisions taken by the bodies of MasterCard setting the MIF as decisions by an association of undertakings.
Yhtenäinen luokitus on olennaisen tärkeä, jotta ammateista voidaan saada vertailukelpoista tietoaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(51) On the national markets for cards (international cards like Visa and Eurocard/Mastercard, store cards and main national debit schemes) Visa holds, in terms of number of cards in circulation a market share varying between 4 % and 69 %.
Kaikki, mihin uskomme ja mitä olemme, on tarjottimella heilleEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Communication from the Commission published pursuant to Article 27(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in Case AT.40049 — Mastercard II
On aiheellista säätää, että tällä asetuksella avattuja tariffikiintiöitä hallinnoidaan kyseisten sääntöjen mukaisestiEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
Google Ads accepts these credit cards as long as they have a Visa or MasterCard logo.
Kerro kun kyllästyt häneensupport.google support.google
173 It follows from this that, as is evident from paragraphs 94 to 96 of the judgment under appeal, the only other option presenting itself at first instance as enabling the MasterCard system to operate without MIF was in fact the hypothesis of a system operating solely on the basis of a prohibition of ex post pricing.
Mitä oikein tarkoitat?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Decision finds that the MasterCard payment organisation and the entities representing it, that is MasterCard Incorporated, MasterCard International Incorporated and MasterCard Europe SPRL, have infringed Article # of the Treaty and Article # of the EEA Agreement by in effect setting a minimum price merchants must pay to their acquiring bank for accepting payment cards in the European Economic Area, by means of the Intra-EEA fallback interchange fees for MasterCard branded consumer credit and charge cards and for MasterCard or Maestro branded debit cards
Tältä kauhulta, joka pian saapuu tämän talon, Sinun talosi, ovelleoj4 oj4
Action brought on 13 February 2019 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO — MasterCard International (AI currencypersonalassistant)
Kuka haluaa jammailla?Eurlex2019 Eurlex2019
On # anuary # isa and Mastercard will apply a liability shift in Europe
Vicenzo Roccara Squarcialupi Brancaleone- vannoo kaiken pyhyyden nimeen, että Pyhän Pietarin sormusECB ECB
(3) Proceedings are ongoing in relation to the other aspect of Case AT.40049, namely inter-regional multilateral interchange fees payable by acquirers to issuers as a result of transactions involving merchants located in the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) that are settled with Mastercard-branded consumer debit or credit cards issued outside the EEA.
Ei hän hoitoa tarvitseEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
72 In those circumstances, it was open to the General Court to find, in the particular circumstances of the case and taking into account the arguments expounded before it, that both the banks’ residual decision-making powers after the IPO on matters other than the MIF, and the commonality of interests between MasterCard and the banks, were both relevant and sufficient for the purposes of assessing whether, after the IPO, MasterCard could still be considered to be an ‘association of undertakings’, within the meaning of Article 81 EC.
Muodostakaa rintama!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
28 According to the Commission, the members of the MasterCard payment organisation collectively exert market power vis-à-vis merchants and their customers.
Koska tämä päätös perustuu Schengenin säännöstöön Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen # osan # osaston määräysten nojalla siltä osin kuin sitä sovelletaan kolmansien maiden kansalaisiin, jotka eivät täytä tai jotka eivät enää täytä lyhytaikaisen oleskelun edellytyksiä, joita sovelletaan jäsenvaltion alueella Schengenin säännöstön määräysten nojalla, Tanska päättää mainitun pöytäkirjan # artiklan mukaisesti kuuden kuukauden kuluessa siitä, kun neuvosto on tehnyt tämän päätöksen, saattaako se sen osaksi kansallista lainsäädäntöäänEurLex-2 EurLex-2
213 sinne gevind in 6 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.