178 In that respect, it must be noted that the Commission may take account of evidence from outside the infringement period if that evidence forms part of the body of evidence relied on by the Commission in order to prove that infringement (see, to that effect, judgment of 2 February 2012 in Case T‐83/08 Denki Kagaku Kogyo and Denka Chemicals v Commission, not published in the ECR, paragraph 193) and that it may rely on factual circumstances which take place subsequent to anti-competitive conduct in order to confirm the content of an objective item of evidence (Case T‐82/08 Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v Commission [2012] ECR, paragraph 55).
Odota, kun panen pisteet paikoilleenEurLex-2 EurLex-2