Chancery Division oor Spaans

Chancery Division

Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Spaans

División de la Cancillería

Sala de la Cancillería

voorbeelde

The Chancery Division deals with the interpretation of wills and the administration of estates.
La Sala de la Cancillería se encarga de la interpretación de los testamentos y de la administración de los patrimonios hereditarios.

Any day now it should be picking up a few briefs in the Chancery Division,’ I assured him.
Cualquier día estará eligiendo casos en la cancillería —le aseguré.

ill v. Hill Ch # (United Kingdom, Chancery Division
ill v. Hill Ch # (Reino Unido, Chancery Division

The Chancery Division deals with the interpretation of wills and the administration of estates.
La Sala de la Cancillería ejerce su competencia en la interpretación de últimas voluntades y en la administración de patrimonios hereditarios.

By Order dated 6 October 2004, the High Court (Chancery Division) referred the following questions to the Court under Article 234 EC:
Mediante resolución de 6 de octubre de 2004, la High Court (Chancery Division) planteó al Tribunal de Justicia las siguientes cuestiones prejudiciales con arreglo al artículo 234 CE:

I suggest that the Court would reply as follows to the questions referred by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division:
Propongo al Tribunal de Justicia que responda a las cuestiones planteadas por la High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, del siguiente modo:

32 MSD brought an action against the Comptroller’s decision before the referring court, the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division, Patents Court.
32 MSD interpuso recurso contra la resolución del director ante el tribunal remitente, la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, Patents Court [Tribunal Superior (Inglaterra y País de Gales), Sala de Derecho de sociedades y propiedad industrial e intelectual, Sección de Patentes, Reino Unido].

The Commissioners’ appeal against that decision was dismissed by the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division by judgment of 8 June 2009.
Mediante sentencia de 8 de junio de 2009, la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division desestimó la apelación de los Commissioners contra esta resolución.

in answer to the question referred to it by the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, by order of 31 October 1994, hereby rules:
pronunciándose sobre la cuestión planteada por la High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, mediante resolución de 31 de octubre de 1994, declara:

L’Oréal brought proceedings before the High Court of Justice of England and Wales (Chancery Division) alleging trade mark infringement against, inter alia, Bellure, Starion and Malaika.
L’Oréal presentó ante la High Court of Justice (England & Wales) una demanda por violación de marca contra, entre otros, Bellure, Starion y Malaika.

However, they requested the referring court, in particular, to decline international jurisdiction, in favour of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division.
Rogeau demandó a los administradores mancomunados, a título de intervención necesaria, ante el tribunal remitente. Éstos solicitaron no obstante al tribunal de commerce de Versailles que se declarase internacionalmente incompetente, a favor de la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division.

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 5 January 2011 — Daiichi Sankyo Company v Comptroller-General of Patents
Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (Reino Unido) el 5 de enero de 2011 — Daiichi Sankyo Company/Comptroller-General of Patents

The appellants in the main proceedings instituted proceedings against TVC before the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, United Kingdom, for breach of their copyright.
12 Las apelantes en el litigio principal interpusieron una demanda contra TVC ante la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division [Tribunal Superior de Justicia (Inglaterra y País de Gales), Sala de la Cancillería, Reino Unido] por violación de sus derechos de autor.

in answer to the questions referred to it by the Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, by orders of 2 October 1998, hereby rules:
pronunciándose sobre las cuestiones planteadas por la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division mediante resoluciones de 2 de octubre de 1998, declara:

Order of the President of the Court of # February # (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court- Chancery Division)- Oakley Inc v Animal Ltd and Others
Auto del Presidente del Tribunal de Justicia de # de febrero de # (petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la High Court- Chancery Division)- Oakley Inc/Animal Ltd y otros

In the light of the foregoing, I suggest that the Court should answer the question referred by the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (Patents Court) as follows:
A la luz de lo anteriormente expuesto, propongo al Tribunal de Justicia que responda del siguiente modo a la cuestión planteada por la High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (Patents Court):

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on # November #- Afton Chemical Limited v The Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (Reino Unido) el # de noviembre de #- Afton Chemical Limited/The Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

in Case C-#/# Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division: easyCar (UK) Ltd v Office of Fair Trading
en el asunto C-#/# [petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division]: easyCar (UK) Ltd contra Office of Fair Trading

Stocks # h # at # ) (United Kingdom, Law Reports, Chancery Division) citing approval for the views of J. Cave in Evans v. Hoare # at # ) (United Kingdom, Law Reports, Queen's Bench
J. Roxborough en Leeman v. Stocks # h # at # ) (Reino Unido, Law Reports, Chancery Division) citando con aprobación las opiniones de J. Cave en Evans v. Hoare # at # ) (Reino Unido, Law Reports, Wueen's Bench

in answer to the questions referred to it by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, by order of 7 March 2000, hereby rules:
pronunciándose sobre las cuestiones planteadas por la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, mediante resolución de 7 de marzo de 2000, declara:

19 O2 and O2 (UK) brought proceedings against H3G for infringement of their bubbles trade marks before the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division.
19 O2 y O2 (UK) interpusieron ante la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, una demanda contra H3G por violación de sus marcas con burbujas.

in answer to the questions referred to it by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, by order of 4 May 2001, hereby rules:
pronunciándose sobre las cuestiones planteadas por la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, mediante resolución de 4 de mayo de 2001, declara:

8 Boehringer Ingelheim and Others objected to those alterations and therefore brought actions for infringement of trade marks before the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division.
8 Boehringer Ingelheim y otros se opusieron a dichas modificaciones y, en consecuencia, presentaron demanda ante la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division (Reino Unido) por violación del derecho de marca.