23 In its judgment in Stöber and Piosa Pereira, (37) the Court followed the same line of reasoning and ruled that the wording of point I,C,(b) of Annex I to the Regulation, to which Article 1(a)(ii) refers, covers only those `workers' who were `compulsorily insured within the framework of one of the schemes therein mentioned [as being] entitled to German family benefits in accordance with Chapter 7 of Title III of [the Regulation]'.
En la cena de ensayoEurLex-2 EurLex-2