48 See, for example, judgment of 13 September 2016, hyphen v EUIPO — Skylotec (Representation of a polygon) (T‐146/15, EU:T:2016:469, paragraph 28), according to which, ‘[in order to find that the distinctive character of the trade mark as registered has altered, it is necessary to carry out] an assessment of the distinctive or dominant character of the components added, on the basis of the intrinsic qualities of each of those components, as well as on the relative position of the different components within the arrangement of the trade mark’; see also judgment of 1 December 2016, Klement v EUIPO (C‐642/15 P, not published, EU:C:2016:918, paragraph 29).
48 Vidjeti primjerice presudu od 13. rujna 2016., hyphen/EUIPO – Skylotec (Prikaz poligona) (T‐146/15, EU:T:2016:469, t. 28.), na temelju koje „tvrđenje o postojanju utjecaja na razlikovni karakter registriranog žiga zahtijeva [...] da se ispita razlikovni i dominantni karakter dodanih elemenata pri čemu se treba osloniti na svojstva svakog pojedinog od tih elemenata kao i na njihovu odnosnu ulogu kod sveukupne izgradnje žiga”; vidjeti također presudu od 1. prosinca 2016., Klement/EUIPO (C‐642/15 P, neobjavljena, EU:C:2016:918, t. 29.).EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021