First, the Commission treated the first undertaking concerned differently from Siemens, Hitachi, VA Tech or Schneider by presuming, because that undertaking was not able to give a definitive indication of when it ended its participation in the infringement, that that undertaking had continued to participate in that infringement, notwithstanding the fact that a cogent body of indirect evidence, to be found in the file, supported their submissions.
Beabsichtigt der Direktor, unbefristete Verträge abzuschließen, so bedarf dies jährlich der Zustimmung des Verwaltungsrates von EuropolEurLex-2 EurLex-2