It is apparent from the contested decision that the Board of Appeal, first, adopted by implication the examiner’s description of the mark at issue, which is set out in paragraph 23 above, secondly, supplemented it in accordance with what was stated in the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal, by pointing out the ‘small stroke in the middle of the curve, towards the bottom’ and, lastly, found that that small stroke did not alter the perception of the mark at issue as being ‘a very simple and banal design, which has an exclusively decorative function and not that of identifying the commercial origin of the goods’.
Στην περίπτωση που ο χώρος αναπηρικής πολυθρόνας έχει σχεδιασθεί για αναπηρική πολυθρόνα στραμμένη προς τα εμπρός, το άνω μέρος των ερεισινώτων των καθισμάτων που βρίσκονται μπροστά από αυτήν επιτρέπεται να εισέρχονται στο χώρο της αναπηρικής πολυθρόνας εφόσον προβλέπεται ελεύθερος χώρος όπως φαίνεται στο παράρτημα #, εικόναEurLex-2 EurLex-2