113 First, it claims the General Court erred in holding, in paragraph 173 of the judgment under appeal, that, since the effects produced by the measures notified by the United Kingdom are an unavoidable consequence of the restrictions on the freedom to provide services, which the General Court considered justified, the Commission did not have to conduct a more in-depth analysis of those consequences than that which it conducted and, therefore, did not err in finding that those measures were compatible with European Union competition law, the absence of market definition notwithstanding.
Hyvälle hallintotavalle ovat ominaisia avoimet suhteet ja toissijaisuusperiaatteen löyhempi soveltaminenEurLex-2 EurLex-2