cavies
Cavia · tengerimalac
cavy oor Hongaars
cavy
en
A guinea pig.
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Hongaars
tengerimalac
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Prenteboek
Soortgelyke frases
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
3. Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs.
Ezen kívül a Bizottság eljárást dolgoz ki a motorkerékpárok és segédmotoros kerékpárok fajlagos CO#-kibocsátásának méréséreEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
16 In particular, first, the Commission presumed, in light of the principles laid down by the case-law of the Courts of the European Union, that Prysmian had exerted a decisive influence over the market conduct of Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia at least between 29 July 2005 and 28 January 2009 and that the applicant had exerted a decisive influence over the market conduct of Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia at least between 29 July 2005 and 3 May 2007 (recital 782 of the contested decision).
Mondtam már, azért költöztünk,... mert anyád költözni akart,... mert tudod a galéria, ahol dolgozik, a környékre költözött,... és ezért aztán ő is költözni akartEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
Forth plea in law, alleging that the Commission wrongly attributed liability to Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. for the period before 27 November 2001 and in so doing breached the principles of personal responsibility and of equal treatment.
Amíg nem hallom a hangját, nincs pihenésEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Prysmian cavi e sistemi Srl, established in Milan,
Semmi baj, nincs mitől félnieEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs.
Az alkalmazással kapcsolatos óvintézkedésekEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
annul Article 1(5) of the decision in so far as it found that Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. participated in an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement from 18 February 1999 to 27 November 2001;
De tapogatózomEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Between 29 July 2005 and 28 January 2009, it was the indirect parent company, through GS Capital Partners V Funds, LP (‘the GSCP V Funds’) and other intermediate companies, of Prysmian SpA and of a wholly owned subsidiary of that company, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (‘PrysmianCS’), formerly Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Energia SpA, and subsequently Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia Srl.
Nem östehetségek a fiúk, de az biztos, hogy vadállatokEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (#-#) # # # or # # #) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.#- Goldman Sachs/Pirelli cavi e sistemi energia/Pirell cavi e sistemi telecom, to the following address
M = a kezdeti vizsgálati minta tömege (milligrammbanoj4 oj4
By judgment of 14 November 2012, Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia v Commission (T‐140/09, not published, EU:T:2012:597), the General Court annulled in part the inspection decision, in so far as it concerned power cables other than high voltage underwater and underground power cables and the material associated with those other cables, and dismissed the action as to the remainder.
utasítja elnökét, hogy továbbítsa ezt az állásfoglalást a Tanácsnak és a Bizottságnak, valamint a tagállamok parlamentjeinek és kormányainakEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
271 Accordingly the applicant’s request to benefit from any reduction granted to the interveners following the action brought against the contested decision in Case T‐475/14, Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission, cannot succeed and, therefore, the claims seeking a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant must be rejected as a whole.
Általában az új terminus első napján nyitják ki,...... de a következő pár nap valószínűleg...... zavaros lesz, úgyhogyEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
SpA (‘Pirelli’), formerly Pirelli SpA, an Italian company, was the parent company of Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi SpA (‘PirelliCS’), then of Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Energia SpA (‘PirelliCSE’), which operated in the submarine and underground power cable sector.
Meg akaraterő, és gógyi!EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
– investigations previously carried out by the Commission in the field of the control of concentrations had confirmed the lack of clear and definitive differentiation between high, medium and low voltage electric cables (Commission decision of 19 July 2000 in Case COMP/M.1882 – Pirelli/BICC, recitals 14 to 32 (see paragraph 56 above); Commission decision of 5 July 2005 in Case COMP/M.3836 – Goldman Sachs/Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Energia/Pirelli Cavi e Sistemi Telecom, paragraphs 12 and 13; Commission decision of 6 January 2006 in Case COMP/M.4050 – Goldman Sachs/Cinven/Ahlsell).
Így csak a #. cikk bekezdése tér ki rugalmas módon a szociális jogok kérdéséreEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3836 — Goldman Sachs/Pirelli cavi e sistemi energia/Pirell cavi e sistemi telecom, to the following address:
az adóvisszatérítésre a törvényben előírt # napos határidő e módosítás előtt lejárt, és a visszatérítendő összeg az adóellenőrzés megindítására tekintet nélkül kamatozni kezdettEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.#- Goldman Sachs/Pirelli cavi e sistemi energia/Pirell cavi e sistemi telecom)- Candidate case for simplified procedure
Sadruddin vagyok, az osztály vezetôjeoj4 oj4
# Cavi is my name but you can call me Cav #
Cici, Patricia, LorenaOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
Following that sale, PirelliCSE became Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia Srl (‘PrysmianCSE’), then PrysmianCS.
Hiba volt megcsinálni a Júdásokat?EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
1) (Case COMP/39.610); secondly, request seeking that the General Court declare unlawful the decision taken by the Commission during that inspection to copy certain computer files to examine them in its offices and, thirdly, request seeking that the General Court order the Commission to abstain from using any document obtained unlawfully and to return to Prysmian and to Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia the documents obtained unlawfully.
Ez csak rád és rám tartozik.Őt hagyjuk ki ebbőlEurLex-2 EurLex-2
4 From 28 January to 3 February 2009, further to the statements made by ABB, the Commission carried out inspections at the premises of Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia and at the premises of other European companies concerned, that is to say, Nexans SA and Nexans France SAS.
Van egy gasztronómiai cikkemEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
By their appeal, Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl ask the Court to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 July 2018, Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission (T‐475/14, EU:T:2018:448; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed their action seeking, first, annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 – Power Cables) (‘the decision at issue’), in so far as it concerns them, and, second, a reduction of the amount of the fines imposed on them in the decision at issue.
A közös támogatásfelügyeleti bizottság összetételét illetően a #. cikk rendelkezéseit megfelelőképpenfigyelembe kell venniEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
The appellants, Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (‘PrysmianCS’), are two Italian companies which together form the Prysmian Group.
Mást nem írt?EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
270 However, by today’s judgment in Case T‐475/14, Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission, the Court has dismissed the action in the case giving rise to that judgment, namely both the claims for annulment made by the interveners and their claims for a reduction of the fines imposed on them.
Mit gondol, ki a fasz maga?Eurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
3 The same question arises in the parallel proceedings in Case C‐601/18 P, Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission.
Ez csodaszép volt!EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
Interveners in support of the defendant: Prysmian SpA (Milan, Italy) and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Milan) (represented by: C.
Remek, és az öné?Eurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
88 Only when a request to that effect is brought before the Court and the undertakings to which a decision under Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 is addressed have put forward certain arguments liable to cast doubt on the reasonableness of the grounds on which the Commission relied in order to adopt that decision may the Court take the view that it is necessary to carry out such a determination (see, to that effect, judgments in Nexans France and Nexans v Commission, paragraph 83 above, EU:T:2012:596, paragraph 72, and in Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia v Commission, paragraph 83 above, EU:T:2012:597, paragraph 70; see, by analogy, judgment of 14 March 2014 Cementos Portland Valderrivas v Commission, T‐296/11, ECR, EU:T:2014:121, paragraph 42).
Nem hallgatok az Ellie- reEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Annuls Commission decision C(2009) 92/2 of 9 January 2009 ordering Prysmian SpA and all companies directly or indirectly controlled by it, including Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia Srl, to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20, paragraph 4, of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC], in so far as it concerns electric cables other than high voltage underwater and underground electric cables and the material associated with those other cables;
Tudtam, hogy ő jár a fejedbenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
79 sinne gevind in 7 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.