In conclusion, it must be found that, as regards the four factors laid down in Article 3(9) of the basic regulation relating to the analysis of a threat of injury, one factor is regarded as irrelevant by the institutions (stocks), two factors show inconsistencies between the Commission’s estimates, confirmed by the Council in the contested regulation, and the relevant post-investigation period data (volume of imports and price of imports) and one factor (capacity of the exporter and risk of redirection of exports) is incomplete in respect of the relevant evidence to be taken into account.
Seepärast asus komisjon seisukohale, et intressikassa kava võib pidada abiks EÜ asutamislepingu artikli # lõike # tähenduses ja et ühtki artikli # lõigetes # ja # sätestatud erandit ei saa kohaldadaEurLex-2 EurLex-2