Obelix oor Fins
Obelix
en
One of the protagonists of the comic-book series Asterix.
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
Obelix
en
One of the protagonists of the comic-book and cartoon series Asterix and Obelix
Then we have three people in there, including Obelix with the braids.
Sisällä on siis kolme henkilöä mukaan lukien letti-Obelix.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
The appellant claims that the judgment of the Court of First Instance infringed Article 63 of Regulation No 40/94 as well as the general principles of Community administrative and procedural law in that it found, contrary to the contested decision of the Board of Appeal, that the conflicting marks, ‘OBELIX’ and ‘MOBILIX’, were not similar, thus ruling to the detriment of the appellant on a question which had not been raised in a formally correct manner, thus exceeding its jurisdiction in the review of decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM in a case such as this one.
Olemme todellakin samalla aaltopituudellaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Board of Appeal should therefore have concluded that the ‘OBELIX’ mark is highly distinctive and well known.
Lennosta vastaavan lentoliikenteen harjoittajan ei tarvitse maksaa # artiklan mukaista korvausta, jos se pystyy osoittamaan, että peruutus johtuu poikkeuksellisista olosuhteista, joita ei olisi voitu välttää, vaikka kaikki kohtuudella edellytettävät toimenpiteet olisi toteutettuEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Oh, no Obelix!
Jäsenvaltioiden on toteutettava tämän puitepäätöksen säännösten noudattamiseksi tarvittavat toimenpiteet # päivään joulukuuta # mennessäOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
Obelix, we don't use tricks!
Etkö näe, etten voi hyvinOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
But Obelix no stones ok?
Kuitenkin olemme myös ehkäisemässä menneisyydestä tuttua maidon ylituotantoa.OpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
Yet that finding cannot apply as such to the OBELIX trade mark, as there is no precedent for saying that famous literary characters must be regarded as well-known trade marks.
En tiedä edes hänen nimeäänEurLex-2 EurLex-2
85 Lastly, the Court must reject the applicant’s argument that, because of the ‘ix’ suffix, it is entirely conceivable that the term ‘mobilix’ would insinuate itself into the family of trade marks made up of the characters from the ‘Asterix’ series and that it would be understood as a derivation of the term ‘obelix’.
Puheenjohtajavaltiota avustava korkeana edustajana toimiva pääsihteeri voi neuvotella tällaisen järjestelyn puheenjohtajavaltion puolestaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Like your braids which are nicer then Obelix's.
Beef Industry Development Society Ltd ja Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd (Kilpailu- EY # artiklan # kohta- Käsite sopimus, jonka tarkoituksena on rajoittaa kilpailua- Tuotantokapasiteetin rajoittamista koskeva sopimus- NaudanlihaOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
Then we have three people in there, including Obelix with the braids.
artikla RahoitusjärjestelytOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
The Appellant further claims that the Court of First Instance violated Article 74 CTMR in refusing to accept that the OBELIX mark was well-known and highly distinctive.
Otetaan vielä pari kertaaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(13) It thus included the question of the similarity of the ‘OBELIX’ and ‘MOBILIX’ signs within the subject-matter of the proceedings.
Meidän täytyy sulkea se voimalaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
As regards the conceptual comparison, the Court of First Instance found that, even if the term ‘OBELIX’ had been registered as a word mark, it would readily be identified by the average member of the public with the popular character from the comic strip, which makes it extremely unlikely that there could be any confusion in the public mind between words which are more or less similar (paragraph 79 of the judgment under appeal).
Minullakin on ikävä sinuaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
1 By its appeal, Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl (‘the appellant’) requests the Court to set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 27 October 2005 in Case T‐336/03 Les Éditions Albert René v OHIM – Orange (MOBILIX) [2005] ECR II‐4667 (‘the judgment under appeal’), dismissing its action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 14 July 2003 (Case R 0559/2002-4; ‘the contested decision’), concerning the opposition filed by the appellant, the proprietor of the earlier mark OBELIX, to the registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign ‘MOBILIX’.
Kauan aikaa sittenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
However, whilst the term ‘mobilix’ may readily be perceived as referring to something mobile or to mobility, the term ‘obelix’, even if the name has been registered as a word mark, that is to say with no visual reference to the comic strip character, will readily be associated by the average member of the public with the corpulent character from the comic strip series, widely known throughout the European Union, which tells of his adventures together with Asterix.
Tulen jotenkin perässäEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Appellant further claims that the Court of First Instance violated articles 44 and 48 of its own Rules of Procedure in that it declared inadmissible the claim, presented in the alternative at the hearing, that the Court remand the case to the Board in order to allow the Appellant to establish the reputation of the mark OBELIX.
Hänellä on ongelmia kaikkiallaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Obelix, you can't just walk off!
Saapuva ulkomaanliikenneOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
Therefore, by declining to take account of the reputation of the Obelix name, which designates a famous comic strip character, in order to define the scope of protection of the earlier mark, the Court of First Instance was correct to apply the rule that, in opposition proceedings relating to relative grounds for refusal to register, the competent authority is restricted to the facts, evidence and arguments provided by the parties and the relief sought.
LÄÄKEMUOTOEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The finding by the Court of First Instance as to whether the facts on which the Board of Appeal of OHIM based its decision are well known, including also the issue of whether the ‘OBELIX’ sign is well known, is a factual assessment which, save where the facts or evidence are distorted, is not subject to review by the Court of Justice on appeal.
Aktivoin sen järjestelmän juuriEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The subject-matter of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal was whether ‘MOBILIX’ could be registered as a Community trade mark for some or all of the goods for which it was filed, given the opposition filed by the appellant on the basis of its ‘OBELIX’ trade mark.
Direktiivissä #/#/ETY säädetään lisäksi, että lampaiden ja vuohien siemennesteen, munasolujen ja alkioiden yhteisöön tuontia varten vahvistetaan erityiset eläinten terveyttä koskevat edellytykset tai direktiivissä säädettyjä takeita vastaavat takeetEurLex-2 EurLex-2
26 The Court concluded, in paragraphs 80 and 81 of the judgment under appeal, that since the word sign ‘OBELIX’ had from the point of view of the relevant public a clear and specific meaning so that the public was capable of grasping it immediately, the conceptual differences separating the signs at issue were such as to counteract the aural similarities and any visual similarities.
Belgiassa Registre du Commerce/HandelsregisterEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Obelix, you can' t just walk off!
Lisäksi tehokas toiminta vaatii huomattavia resursseja kuljetusketjun eriytettyyn verkkoon kytkeytymistä vartenopensubtitles2 opensubtitles2
Obelix where are you going?
Missä McKeavey on?opensubtitles2 opensubtitles2
Case T-#/#: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of # October #- Les Éditions Albert René v OHIM (Community trade mark- Opposition proceedings- Earlier Community and national word mark OBELIX- Application for Community word mark MOBILIX- Article #(b) and of Regulation (EC) No
Jäsenvaltioiden olisi otettava tämän suosituksen toteuttamisessa huomioon yhtiömuotoisten yhteissijoitusyritysten erityispiirteet ja vältettävä oikeudelliselta muodoltaan erilaisten yhteissijoitusyritysten tarpeetonta eriarvoista kohteluaoj4 oj4
Getafix, Obelix and Asterix. " How sweet.
Sinun pitäisi tulla minun mukaani!OpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
The appellant – Les Éditions Albert René SARL – is requesting the Court to set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Third Chamber) (‘the Court of First Instance’) in Case T‐336/03 Les Éditions Albert René v OHIM – Orange (MOBILUX) [2005] ECR II-4667 (‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the Court of First Instance dismissed its appeal against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs) (OHIM) of 14 July 2003 (Case R 0559/2002-4) relating to opposition proceedings between the appellant and Orange A/S (‘Orange’) concerning the opposition by the appellant, proprietor of the earlier trade mark ‘OBELIX’, to registration as a Community trade mark of the sign ‘MOBILIX’.
pyytää jäsenvaltioita yleistämään ja käyttämään parhaiksi havaittuja keinoja alueellisten ja kansallisten ympäristöviranomaisten välisten verkostojen rakentamiseksi hajautetusti hallinnoidun rakennepolitiikan kaikille aloilleEurLex-2 EurLex-2
187 sinne gevind in 6 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.