The commission’s report found that in many instances, Thai security forces acted appropriately to protect public safety and to defend themselves. However, the commission also concluded that the level of force and type of weapons used in the April 28 attack on the Kruesie Mosque was “disproportionate to the threat posed by the militants” and “the tactic of laying siege to the Mosque, surrounding it with security personnel, in tandem with the use of negotiation with the militants, could have ultimately led to their surrender.” The commission said that resolving the standoff at the mosque “through peaceful means would have been more appropriate and better served the interests of the security personnel than the use of force.”
ค่าความสว่าง, ความเปรียบต่าง, ค่าแกมม่าhrw.org hrw.org