77 Za týchto podmienok žaloba, ktorá ako je to v prejednávanej veci, navrhuje uloženie paušálnej pokuty, nemôže byť zamietnutá ako neprimeraná len z dôvodu, že jej predmetom je nesplnenie povinnosti, ktoré, hoci pretrvávalo v čase, keď už však Súdny dvor skúmal skutkové okolnosti, skončilo.
The European Parliament takes the view that the company bodies should be jointly and severally liable for loss and/or damage incurred by the EPC on account of its assets having been depleted, for the benefit of a company body, a member or a person closely associated with one of these, through acts of the company; that the recipient of an unwarranted payment by the company should be responsible for refunding it; that liability should arise only if the act was not in the recognised interests of the EPC; that liability should not arise, in particular, if the EPC is integrated within a group following a consistent policy and any disadvantages are offset by the advantages of its belonging to a group; and that the liability of the executive directors or members under other legal provisions should not be thereby affectedEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021