32 Concerning the assessment of the Courts of the European Union as to whether an act of an institution is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment, it must be stated that, in order to establish that that institution committed a manifest error in assessing complex facts so as to justify the annulment of that act, the evidence adduced by the applicant must be sufficient to make the factual assessments used in the act implausible (see, to that effect, judgments of 12 December 1996 in AIUFFASS and AKT v Commission, T‐380/94, ECR, EU:T:1996:195, paragraph 59, and 28 February 2012 in Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung v Commission, T‐282/08, EU:T:2012:91, paragraph 158).
En pidä uudesta urastasi.Melkein kuolin tänäänEurLex-2 EurLex-2