In the Government's opinion, Mr. Ulke's trial, following his initial conviction, cannot be regarded as relating to “continuing offences” or a “single offence”
Abductions are considered a continuing offence as long as the perpetrators continue to conceal the whereabouts of the victims and these facts remain unclarified
Abductions are considered a continuing offence as long as the perpetrators continue to conceal the whereabouts of the victims and these facts remain unclarified.
The word “continuing”, makes the offence of retention of ill-gotten wealth a continuing offence and is not defeated by the argument of retrospectivity.
The Working Group reminds States that enforced disappearance is a continuing offence for as long as the fate or whereabouts of the victim remains unclarified.
The Working Group reminds States that enforced disappearance is a continuing offence for as long as the fate or whereabouts of the victim remains unclarified.
The Working Group reminds States that enforced disappearance is a continuing offence for as long as the fate or whereabouts of the victim remains unclarified
The Supreme Court also decided that the doctrine of “continuing offence of kidnapping” should prevent any application of amnesty or prescription to cases of enforced disappearances.
“Acts constituting enforced disappearance shall be considered a continuing offence as long as perpetrators continue to conceal the fate and whereabouts of persons who have disappeared.”