Jag anser snarare, om man tillämpar testet (som kommissionen har beskrivit) huruvida ”preskriptionsfristen inte börjar löpa förrän de skadebringande verkningarna av denna akt har uppstått och således inte innan de berörda har lidit en säker skada”, att en sådan utomstående åskådare skulle ha ansett att, även om den allmänna karaktären hos skadan som de sökanden skulle kunna lida om de inte erhöll betalning av gemenskapsstödet kan ha varit uppenbar år 1983, var dess oundvikliga karaktär inte självklar.
Rather, applying the test (as set out by the Commission) that ‘the limitation period cannot begin to run before all the injurious effects of the measure have been produced and consequently before the time when the applicants were bound to incur damage which was certain in character’, I consider that such a bystander would have said that, although the general nature of the damage that the applicants were likely to suffer if they were not paid the Community aid might be obvious in June 1983, its unavoidable nature was not.EurLex-2 EurLex-2