Indeed, termination of the infringement as soon as the Commission intervenes can logically constitute an attenuating circumstance only if there are reasons to suppose that the undertakings concerned were encouraged to cease their anti-competitive activities by the interventions in question, whereas a case where the infringement has already come to an end before the date on which the Commission first intervenes is not covered by that provision of the Guidelines (Case C‐407/04 P Dalmine v Commission [2007] ECR I‐829, paragraph 158).
Určovanie projektov spoločného záujmu, ich špecifikácií a prioritných projektov, najmä projektov európskeho záujmu, by sa malo uskutočniť bez toho, aby boli dotknuté výsledky posúdenia vplyvov projektov, plánov alebo programov na životné prostredieEurLex-2 EurLex-2