Is alarmed by the admission by the former President of the Eurogroup before the European Parliament that the Eurogroup endorsed the recommendations of the Troika without extensive consideration of their specific policy implications; stresses that, if accurate, this does not discharge euro area finance ministers from their political responsibility for the macroeconomic adjustment programmes and the MoUs; points out that this admission sheds a worrying light on the blurred scope of the ‘technical advising’ and ‘Eurogroup agency’ roles devolved to both the Commission and the ECB in the framework of the design, implementation and assessment of assistance programmes; deplores, from that perspective, the lack of any clear and accountable case-by-case mandates from the Council and the Eurogroup to the Commission;
je zaskrbljen, da je prejšnji predsednik Euroskupine pred Evropskim parlamentom priznal, da je Euroskupina odobrila priporočila trojke, ne da bi obširneje preučila njihove specifične posledice za politiko; poudarja, da to, tudi če je res, ne razreši finančnih ministrov euroobmočja njihove politične odgovornosti za programe makroekonomskega prilagajanja in memorandume o soglasju; opozarja, da to priznanje skrb vzbujajoče osvetljuje nejasno področje uporabe tehničnega svetovanja in vloge agencije Euroskupine, namenjene Komisiji in ECB v okviru snovanja, izvajanja in ocenjevanja programov pomoči; s tega vidika obžaluje pomanjkanje jasnih in odgovornih pristojnosti za vsak posamezni primer, ki jih Komisiji zagotavljata Svet in Euroskupina;eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20