coercion oor Afrikaans

coercion

/koʊˈɜrʃən/, /koʊˈɜrʒən/ naamwoord

(not countable) Actual or threatened force for the purpose of compelling action by another person; the act of coercing.

Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Afrikaans

dwang

The use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance.

Of course, unity of belief cannot be achieved by coercion.
Eenheid van geloof kan natuurlik nooit deur dwang verkry word nie.

voorbeelde

(1 Thessalonians 2:7, 8) When such closeness exists, a happy flock, motivated fully by love of God, will respond well to direction without coercion and will do their utmost in willing service to him. —Compare Exodus 35:21.
Wanneer daar sulke sterk bande bestaan, sal ’n gelukkige kudde, wat ten volle deur liefde vir God beweeg word, sonder dwang goed op leiding reageer en hulle bes doen om gewillige diens aan God te lewer.—Vergelyk Exodus 35:21.

Márcia Serra Negra, a lawyer and specialist in family matters, is quoted as saying: “What the storks are doing is a kind of coercion.”
Márcia Serra Negra, ’n prokureur en spesialis op die gebied van gesinsake, het glo gesê: “Wat die ooievaars doen, is ’n soort afpersing.”

Thus, each person or family could demonstrate thankfulness without coercion.
Elke persoon of gesin kon dus sonder dwang dankbaarheid betoon.

Nagging, begging, coercion, and ridicule seldom meet with success.
’n Neulery, ’n gesoebat, dwang en bespotting werk selde.

And he has done so without using coercion.
En hy het dit gedoen sonder om dwang te gebruik.

As a result, some are willing to use either coercion or violence to obtain children for their perverted use, including rape and murder.
Gevolglik is party bereid om dwang of geweld te gebruik om kinders vir hulle verdorwe gebruike te verkry, wat verkragting en moord insluit.

It is disregard for this principle that has fomented court battles that keep the pendulum swinging between freedom and coercion.
Dit is die minagting van hierdie beginsel wat tot hofsake gelei het wat die pendulum steeds tussen vryheid en dwang laat swaai.

A number of scholars affirm that Augustine, the famous Catholic “Church Father,” was the first to support the principle of “religious” coercion, that is, the use of force to combat heresy.
’n Aantal geleerdes bevestig dat Augustinus, die bekende Katolieke “Kerkvader”, die eerste was om die beginsel van “godsdiens”-dwang te ondersteun, met ander woorde die gebruik van geweld om kettery te bestry.

Bruppacher, a Protestant minister, as saying: “While men who call themselves Christians have failed in the decisive tests, these unknown witnesses of Jehovah, as Christian martyrs, are maintaining unshakable opposition against coercion of conscience and heathen idolatry.
Bruppacher, ’n Protestantse geestelike, aangehaal wat gesê het: “Terwyl manne wat hulleself Christene noem in die beslissende toetse misluk het, weier hierdie onbekende getuies van Jehovah, as Christenmartelare, volstrek om hulle gewete te skend en heidense afgodediens te beoefen.

Spontaneity and warmth would be absent from the Corinthians’ giving if coercion were present.’
Die Korintiërs sou nie spontaan en uit die hart kon gee as hulle gedwing is nie.’

(Malachi 3:6; Matthew 22:37; Revelation 4:11) However, our dedication should not be based on credulity, fleeting emotions, or coercion from others —even parents.
Maar ons toewyding moenie gegrond wees op goedgelowigheid, kortstondige emosies of dwang deur ander nie—selfs nie eers deur ouers nie.

The pitiful immigrants thus find themselves shackled in endless modern-day slavery, constantly subjected to exploitation, coercion, robbery, and rape.
Die arme immigrante word gevolglik vasgevang in die kettings van hedendaagse slawerny, waar hulle voortdurend onderwerp word aan uitbuiting, dwang, berowing en verkragting.

Pleadings, coercion, and threats were used to try to break my integrity to God —to no avail.
Pleidooie, dwang en dreigemente is gebruik om my te probeer kry om my onkreukbaarheid teenoor God prys te gee—maar sonder sukses.

Soon, toleration was replaced by coercion.
Kort voor lank is verdraagsaamheid vervang deur dwangmaatreëls.

“The Swiss Pastor Bruppacher observed in 1939 that ‘While men who call themselves Christians have failed in the decisive tests, these unknown witnesses of Jehovah, as Christian martyrs, are maintaining unshakable opposition against coercion of conscience and heathen idolatry . . .
“Die Switserse pastoor Bruppacher het in 1939 opgemerk: ‘Terwyl manne wat hulleself Christene noem in die beslissende toetse misluk het, weier hierdie onbekende getuies van Jehovah as Christenmartelare volstrek om hulle gewete te skend en heidense afgodediens te beoefen . . .

Under this law, once a gangster organization is designated as such, it is prohibited from 11 acts of violent coercion, including the demanding of hush money, participation in protection rackets, and intervention in settling disputes for a fee.
Wanneer ’n organisasie kragtens hierdie wet as ’n bende-organisasie bestempel word, is daar 11 dade van gewelddadige dwang waaraan dié organisasie hom nie skuldig mag maak nie, waaronder die eis van omkoopgeld, deelname aan beskermingskemas en inmenging in die beslegting van geskille vir betaling.

A German court has determined that prostitution is “not fundamentally immoral,” provided it does not involve criminal coercion, reports the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
’n Duitse hof het beslis dat prostitusie “nie wesenlik onsedelik” is nie, mits daar geen dwang uitgeoefen word nie, berig die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

(1 Corinthians 13:1-3) When Bible writers refer to Christians as slaves of God, they are not referring to abject servitude based on coercion.
Wanneer Bybelskrywers na Christene verwys as slawe van God, verwys hulle nie na willose slawerny wat op dwang gegrond is nie (Romeine 12:11; Kolossense 3:24).

8 The Bible clearly shows that true Christians do not serve God under coercion.
8 Die Bybel toon duidelik dat ware Christene God nie onder dwang dien nie.

It includes coercion and restriction of movement—the fact that “someone is not free to leave, to change an employer.”
Dit sluit dwang en beperking van beweging in—die feit dat “iemand nie vry is om weg te gaan, om van werkgewer te verander nie”.

Moreover, it must avoid all forms of coercion, from cajoling the patient to obtaining a court order to force a blood transfusion.”—Health Progress, June 1989.
Dit moet boonop alle vorme van dwang vermy, van pogings om die pasiënt om te rokkel tot die verkryging van ’n hofbevel om ’n bloedoortapping aan hom op te dwing.”—Health Progress, Junie 1989.

The second article guarantees freedom for the individual “to have or to adopt the religious beliefs that he prefers and practice, collectively or individually, the acts of worship or rites of his preference . . . , to profess no religious beliefs . . . , not to be an object of discrimination, coercion, or hostility because of one’s religious beliefs . . . , to associate and meet together peacefully for religious purposes.”
Die tweede artikel waarborg vryheid vir die individu “om die godsdiensoortuiging wat hy verkies en beoefen, gesamentlik of individueel, sowel as die dade van aanbidding of gebruike van sy keuse te hê of aan te neem . . . , om geen godsdiensoortuiging te bely nie . . . , om nie ’n voorwerp van diskriminasie, dwang of vyandigheid weens sy godsdiensoortuiging te wees nie . . . , om in vrede te assosieer en vir godsdiensdoeleindes byeen te kom”.

In this series of articles, the word “terrorism” generally has reference to the use of violence as a means of coercion.
In hierdie reeks artikels verwys die woord “terrorisme” oor die algemeen na die gebruik van geweld as ’n dwangmiddel.

Jehovah does not want mechanical obedience impelled by threats and coercion.
Jehovah wil nie hê dat mense hom moet gehoorsaam net omdat hulle gedreig en gedwing word nie.

According to the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, the term “violence against women” can refer to “any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or mental harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life.”
Volgens die Verenigde Nasies se Verklaring oor die Beëindiging van Geweld teen Vroue kan die term “geweld teen vroue” verwys na “enige daad van geweld op grond van geslag wat lei tot, of waarskynlik sal lei tot, fisiese, seksuele of verstandelike leed aan of lyding vir vroue, met inbegrip van dreigemente van sulke dade, dwang of eiemagtige ontneming van vryheid, hetsy dit in die openbaar of in die privaat lewe plaasvind”.