appeal to consequences
Argumentum ad consequentiam
appeal oor Hongaars
appeal
en
(law) (a) An application for the removal of a cause or suit from an inferior to a superior judge or court for reëxamination or review. (b) The mode of proceeding by which such removal is effected. (c) The right of appeal. (d) An accusation; a process which formerly might be instituted by one private person against another for some heinous crime demanding punishment for the particular injury suffered, rather than for the offense against the public. (e) An accusation of a felon at common law by one of his accomplices, which accomplice was then called an approver. --Tomlins. --Bouvier.
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Hongaars
fellebbezés
en
application for the removal of a cause to a superior judge for reexamination
The second ground of appeal seeks to challenge that assessment.
A fellebbezés második jogalapja ezen álláspont vitatására irányul.
fellebbez
en
to call upon another
Yep, he's appealing his case, and I want to make sure he doesn't win.
Igen, fellebbez az ügyében és meg akartam bizonyosodni arról, hogy nem nyer.
öröm
In the images of celebrating Iraqis we have seen the ageless appeal of human freedom.
Az ünneplő irakiak arcáról az emberi szabadság öröme sugárzik kortól függetlenül.
En 23 vertalings meer. Besonderhede is ter wille van die beknoptheid verborge
hivatkozik · fordul · felhívás · kérés · vonz · vonzerő · könyörög · apellál · esdekel · hivatkozás · könyörgés · tetszik · vonzás · csábít · fellebbvitel · folyamodás · kíván · csáb · folyamodik · varázs · fordulás · báj · esdeklés
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Soortgelyke frases
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
As the General Court found in paragraphs 240 and 242 et seq. of the judgment under appeal, the information given to the Commission on the individual undertakings was not specific enough to impose a procedural obligation on it.
Mit bámulsz így?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
HBH considers that the cross-appeal should be rejected as unfounded.
A halaknak elegendő időt kell biztosítani az akklimatizálódásra és a vízminőségi feltételekben bekövetkezett változásokhoz való alkalmazkodásraeurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
The General Court therefore provided reasons to the requisite legal standard for the judgment under appeal.
Stifler úr, mint már mondtam, két napja...lemondta a helyfoglalásátEurLex-2 EurLex-2
61 As to the remainder, in so far as the arguments set out in paragraphs 50 to 52 of the present judgment allege an error of law with regard to the assessment of the question whether MasterCard is an association of undertakings, it should be noted that, contrary to the Commission’s contention, the appellants are not, in essence, merely challenging the assessment of the facts made at first instance, but are relying, for the main part, on questions of law which are admissible at the appeal stage.
Mindent megteszekEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In view of the relevance of the issue raised in the context of the Kingdom of Spain’s sixth ground of appeal, I propose examining it at an early stage.
Az átmeneti időszak alatt ésEurLex-2 EurLex-2
121 Therefore, the third ground of appeal must also be dismissed.
Amint híre megy, a nyomok elvezetnek tőlem hozzádEurLex-2 EurLex-2
159 That approach to the division of liability, which was challenged in their appeal by the applicants, who claimed that the Commission should be held liable on a joint and several basis with the murderer, was rejected by the General Court, which upheld the appeal on that point and attributed liability on a joint and several basis to the Commission (thus for 100% of the damage) (the judgment after referral, paragraphs 96 to 119).
Ez biztos egész vagyont ér!Eurlex2019 Eurlex2019
By order of 16 July 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ S.A. to bear its own costs.
Ez csodaszép volt!EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
If the reply is in the negative, the national court has indicated that it intends to dismiss INB’s appeal as unfounded.
Hé!A szerencsés #- as!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
18 After rejecting, in paragraphs 21 to 25 of the judgment under appeal, a number of pleas as inadmissible because they were new pleas, the General Court held, in paragraph 27 of that judgment, that Mr Fiorucci had put forward in essence two pleas in law, alleging infringement of Article 52(2)(a) and Article 50(1)(c), respectively, of Regulation No 40/94.
Jézusom, nyúl valamiértEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 March 2020 in Case R 1916/2019-4
Milyen a pizza?EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
37 According to OHIM, the applicant’s contention that the mark was not put to genuine use is a new plea since, in the initial plea advanced before the Board of Appeal, the applicant merely claimed that it was not proven that the earlier mark had been used for products with specific therapeutic applications, namely ophthalmic applications, without calling into question the genuine nature of that use.
A vizsgálat előkészítéseEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Accordingly, the General Court erred in law by holding, in paragraphs 186 and 235 of the judgment under appeal, that the evidence in the administrative file was not such as to substantiate, to the requisite legal standard and unequivocally, the conclusions drawn by the Commission for the purposes of the assessment, at SKK 435 million (approximately EUR 14.5 million), of the proceeds from the sale of the applicant’s assets upon bankruptcy.
Elég régóta ismerem.Nem kell aggódnod, oké? De aggódom!eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
By its eleventh ground of appeal, CPEM complains that the Court of First Instance erred in law in stating that CPEM considered the promoter’s guide as not capable of being relied on and dismissing its arguments in this respect, when in fact it did not regard the guide as incapable of being relied on but merely complained of the existence of several different versions leading to judicial uncertainty and failure to respect the right to an inter partes hearing
Valamiféle zsaru vagy?oj4 oj4
69 – Paragraph 52 of the Akzo and Akcros’ appeal.
Légvédelem?- Nem, ahhoz kapható állványEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The action before the General Court and the judgment under appeal
Gyerünk, édesem, lélegezzEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(65) Recently, when giving its second preliminary ruling under the urgent procedure, the Court accepted, in Santesteban Goicoechea, (66) a reference from the indictment division of a French court of appeal.
Ez meg mit jelentsen?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
72 So far as the first part of this ground of appeal is concerned, the Court notes that, under Article 21 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, actions challenging measures of the EU institutions must be formally brought against the institution to which the contested measure is attributable.
Általában néha egy- egy őrült napon van, hogy közepeseketEurLex-2 EurLex-2
They shall as a minimum point out in the information provided which reception conditions the applicants are entitled to, the consequences of absconding, the grounds for detention, the grounds for replacement, reduction or withdrawal of any material reception conditions and the applicant ́s right to appeal against detention or decisions relating to the replacement, reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions.
Nagyon sok féle koporsó vannot-set not-set
In the context of that re-examination, the outcome of the appeal depends on whether or not a new decision with the same operative part as the decision under appeal may be lawfully adopted at the time of the appeal ruling.
Könyörgünk, hagyd, hogy segítsünk rajtad!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
12 In particular, in paragraphs 18 and 19 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal stated the following:
Megérkeztünk!Itt a lakáskulcsomEurLex-2 EurLex-2
20 OHIM points out that findings made by the Opposition Division which were not contested by the defendant before the Board of Appeal cannot form part of the subject‐matter of the proceedings for the first time before the Court.
Későn jöttünk, igaz?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The finding in paragraph 149 of the judgment under appeal that cross-price elasticity does not remove the appellant’s scope to increase its ADSL prices is accurate but irrelevant.
Guido Contini producere szót kérEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In my view that too provides a different framework to CPVR and therefore does not impugn the judgment under appeal.
Teenie szülinapjáraEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The appeal which Mr Bourgès-Maunoury and Ms Heintz brought against those notices on 4 February 2009 was dismissed by decision of that tax office of 18 February 2009.
Amit kérek magától...... hogy legyen bátorsága mellé állni, ha én már nem leszekEurLex-2 EurLex-2
208 sinne gevind in 3 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.